* Too big to talk? Goofy litigation over corporate free speech rights is likely heading straight to the Supreme Court. [Wa Po] * Arizona judge soon to decide if abortion laws go back to 1901. [CNN] * Pork is on hold in Mass. pending litigation. L&T sandwiches just don't taste the same. [WWLP] * Hey 1Ls, if you wanted a quick primer on statutory hermeneutics, look no further than abortion laws! [The Atlantic]
* Hopefully, Texas's "Big Companies Don't Need Freedom Of Speech" law will go to the Supreme Court. [The Hill] * Gov. Murphy wants officers to be licensed to protect. [Bronx News] * The Due Process clause was invoked to suspend a law that would make abortions illegal if an opinion like Dobbs overrules Roe. [MSNBC] * Biden bumps baby bumpers to save sleeping babes. Say that 5 times fast. [NPR] * You're not the only one checking your emails. Hopefully, other states will make it so your job has to tell you when they snoop around. [INC]
As the use of artificial intelligence permeates legal practice, a critical question confronts every legal professional who uses these tools: Can I trust this?
* When a case about giant inflatable cats and rats comes before Judge Easterbrook, he rises to the occasion. [FindLaw] * Lesson from the Lochte incident. [Huffington Post] * Analyzing the cert petitions filed with the Court this summer. [Empirical SCOTUS] * Expanding corporate speech to deny climate change. [Law360 (sub. req.)] * The role of expert testimony in the talcum powder case. [The Expert Institute] * Get your tickets for this Friday's reading of two legally themed TV pilots. [The Tank]